Wireless Mind, Gullible Mind – The EMF Trojan Horse

9 09 2009

Wireless Mind, Gullible Mind – The EMF Trojan Horse

By CHELLIS GLENDINNING

eco ne credite,  Teuri,
quidquid id est,  timeo Danaos et dona ferentes.
–Virgil,  Aeneid

I have been contemplating the infamous Trojan Horse whose deus-ex-machina arrival at the edge of Troy stirred wonder among the gullible citizens,  only to lure them to their demise.

I think such thoughts because another mighty horse has been steered into our midst,  and like Trojans we have thrown open the gates to welcome it in.

I am referring to the onslaught of wireless technologies in the form of microwave towers,  satellites showering the planet with radiation,  Wireless Fidelity (WiFi) ports,  Wireless Interoperability for Microwave Access (WiMAX) antennas — plus all the gadgets they make possible:  cordless phones,  pagers,  Blackberries,  roving laptops,  wireless water meters,  satellite TV and radio,  in-flight internet.  I am referring as well to the electromagnetic weapons,  radiation-emitting stations,  surveillance instruments,  and crowd-control devices military and law enforcement deploy.

These sources of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation,  or radiofrequency,  present a frightening specter.  Some 3,000-plus medical,  biological,  and epidemiological studies have demonstrated links between exposure and deterioration of the blood-brain barrier that blocks viruses and bacteria,  DNA damage,  leukemia,  nervous system disorders,  immune deficiency,  heart arrhythmias and coronaries,  insomnia,  anxiety,  depression,  memory loss,  dizziness,  deafness,  brain tumors,  etc.

And who is poised to slam the gates on this interloper?   Not many.  Somehow a population with DDT,  Love Canal,  the Dalkon Shield Intrauterine Device,  asbestos,  Three Mile Island,  and Agent Orange under its belt is mustering up the same old psychological defenses it used to not learn from those debacles.

I made “somehow” my business during the 1980s anti-nuclear movement;  I studied the psyche’s means of blotting out concern for weapons build-up.  I went on to research the challenges endured by survivors of health-threatening technologies and the public’s means of dismissing their suffering.

Truth is,  we’re not looking at a horse of a very different color today.  Those same methods the psyche used to numb against the arms race and deny the existence of asbestos workers and DES daughters are here again.

GULLIBLE MIND

Social philosopher Lewis Mumford’s concept of “mad rationality” comes to mind.  And renegade Freudian R.D. Laing’s assertion that our “socially shared hallucinations,  our collusive madness is what we call sanity.”  Too,  psychoanalyst Eric Fromm’s observation:  “That millions of people share the same form of mental pathology does not make those people sane.”

Let’s consider repression:  blanking out the facts and one’s feelings about the facts.  As psychologist Daniel Goleman puts it:  “One forgets,  then forgets one has forgotten.”  In this case the forgetting is made more likely because,  like radiation from nuclear technologies,  electromagnetic radiation is invisible.  And indeed,  upon hearing of links between radiofrequency and disease,  some people sputter “Uh,”  spin around in a fog,  and flee.  Telecommunications corporations rely on repression when touting their happy-talk-keep-talkin’ claims.  “Satellite dishes receive radiation perfectly.  There’s no spillover,”  announce public-relations departments,  while consumers stampede to their local satellite-TV outlets with nary a “Hello?”

Denial is like repression but carries an edge of active manipulation.  When we repress,  we erase the whole enchilada;  when we deny,  we rearrange the facts to make reality more palatable.  Needless to say,  the industry is the #1 perpetrator of this psychic defense.  But the public isn’t bad at it either.  After four decades of bio-radiological research,  Dr. Robert O. Becker gave his wrap-up in 2000:  “I have no doubt in my mind that at the present time the greatest polluting element in the earth’s environment is the proliferation of electromagnetic fields.”  Environmental scientist Dr. Neil Cherry predicts that every human will develop not one,  but many cancers.   A New Mexico journalist with autoimmune disease,  whose husband contracted cancer after they installed satellite internet-TV,  responded with:  “It’s just another thing in an already polluted world.”

Selective attention is a sub-category of denial:  letting in some facts but not others.  Like the artist who insists that cell phones are dangerous,  but cell towers are not.  And the sign-maker who busted his ass to contribute banners to fight the T-Mobile tower a half mile from his home – and then installed WiFi in the house.

With personal disconnection we may admit a problem but proclaim that,  because of this or that,  it has no personal impact.  Emblematic is a chat I had with a non-profit administrator whose neighborhood in San Francisco was one of the first WiFi “hot spots” in the U.S.  His wife had developed strange health problems while living there — which disappeared every summer when she went to Vermont.  To him,  though,  yoga and vitamins would provide protection.

Rationalization is the mind’s alibi. “But,  but,  but,  but….”  But I need my iPhone to report I’m noshing an energy bar at ticketing/buckled in to seat 23A/waiting at baggage claim/hailing a cab/knocking on your front door.  But here in Austin I can’t get my favorite Boston radio station.  But I have to check my email every ten minutes.  But my girlfriends are on their phones six hours a day,  I only use mine for four!

With projection we split the content of our minds into “Save” and “Delete”– and throw what we deem unacceptable onto persons and objects outside ourselves.  Come hell or high water,  the telecommunications industry is muscling its $1-trillion way toward  planetary dominion;  in the face of such might,  vulnerability before the toxic emissions demands an outlet,  lest we face our fear of confrontation.  One ready target is the already fallen:  the electro-sensitive.  Like atomic vets and Three Mile Island residents before them,  they have become recipients of disdain and discrimination,  called “crazy,”    given zero support,  and pushed to the margins where,  often homeless,  they live in their cars.

Resignation is the roll-over-play-dead defense.  “Ah well.”

COULD UNEXPECTED LIBERATION OF THE MIND BE FAR BEHIND?

Meanwhile – as both Democrats and Republicans throw open the gates for the industry’s plot to build a national “Smart Grid” that will leave no inch of North America unWiMAXed – Virgil’s 2000-year-old warning becomes timely:  “Whatever it is,  I fear the Greeks,  even bringing gifts.”

Ever since the U.S. Telecommunications Act of 1996 welcomed W.T.O-inspired deregulation and F.C.C.- bolstered corporate protections,  a group of scientists and  citizens has been active,  working through such groups as EMR Network,  EMR Policy Network,  and Council on Wireless Technology Impacts.  Microwave News has consistently provided information and updates.

At the same time illnesses that had been relatively unusual have become normal.  Diabetes,  asthma,  testicular cancer,  brain tumors,  malignant melanoma,  immune deficiency,  chronic fatigue,  childhood cancers,  sleep dysfunction,  autism,  multiple sclerosis,  hypothyroidism,  anxiety disorders,  epilepsy,  strokes,  heart attacks.

As a mental health professional,  I am well aware that the psyche has the wherewithal to grip its defenses ‘til knuckle-white death.  And yet,  in my lifetime,  I have also witnessed miraculous and unexpected liberations of the mind.

Chellis Glendinning, Ph.D.,  LPCC,  is a psychotherapist.  Her books include When Technology Wounds (1990) and the forthcoming Luddite.com: A Personal History of Technology.  She is a descendant of Alexander Graham Bell.

Notes

WIRELESS 101

When the microwave oven was first unveiled,  consumers were told to jump back after turning it on.  The radiation in a microwave oven is the same as what comes off a cell tower or an iPhone.  The only difference:  the industry decided not to warn you anymore.

A significant increase in cancer,  particularly breast and brain,  occurs within ¾ mile of a cell tower.

When not being used but still turned on,  cell phones draw down radiofrequency waves.  Men who wear cell phones on their belts can get testicular cancer.

If you can walk around talking on your phone,  it is cordless – read: wireless — and has the same impact as a cell phone.  Worse,  the base station is your own private,  in-house,   24/7 cell tower.

The more data transmitted,  the more radiation is required.  Ergo:  WiFi,  which can send written data and photos,  is more toxic than simple cell-phone messages.  WiMAX,  which can handle movies,  videos,  and huge transfers of written material,  is more dangerous than WiFi.

WiFi extends 300 feet from its port.  When you turn it on in your house,  you contaminate your neighbors.

Hybrid cars infuse drivers and passengers with electromagnetic radiation.

Compact fluorescent lights can trigger migraine headaches,  dizziness,  and epileptic seizures.

Laboratory animals implanted with ID chips display an increase in malignant tumors,  with the cancer often wrapped around the implant.  This is the same device sold in pet stores to keep track of your beloved animal-people.

Radiofrequency from towers causes forest die-off,  bird deaths,  and cancer in farm animals.

Some people can feel electromagnetic radiation – between 4% and 30%.  They get heart palpitations,  dizziness,  brain fog,  visual light flashes,  and ringing in the ears.  Many people don’t feel anything.  And some do,  but have no idea why they feel ill.

The more radiation you are exposed to,  the more likely you are to develop sensitivity.

Scientists are exploring a causal relationship between the proliferation of wireless technologies and global warming — which stands to reason when you think about how hot a microwave oven gets.

A BRIEF HISTORY  OF RESISTANCE

May 2000.  Pioneering a legal concept called “electromagnetic trespass,”  a Spanish court orders Iberdrola S.A. to remove its transformer from an apartment building and pay for residents’ medical bills.

July 2001.  In Cyprus a peaceful demonstration against Britain’s planned military communications towers turns into a riot after police open fire.  Protestors ransack a police station and demand the release of their prime minister who had been doing civil disobedience atop a 160-foot mast.

September 2002.  Scientists meet at the International Conference State of the Research in Electromagnetic Fields in Catania,  Italy,  and issue a declaration warning against electromagnetic exposure.

October 2002.  German doctors issue the Freiburger Appeal proclaiming the relationship between microwave exposure and disease.  Thousands of doctors worldwide sign on.

February 2003.  After the biggest-ever protest meeting of a village in northern New Mexico,  the local school board cancels an already-signed contract to erect cell towers on its schools.

March 2003.  The Catholic Church in Italy calls for cell-phone antennas to be removed from bell towers,  branding them dangerous to human health and spiritually “out of keeping.

November 2003.  In England and Ireland citizens bulldoze down cell towers –- as many as eight each week.

February 2006.  Ontario University in Canada bans WiFi from campus.

February 2006.  An international congress of scientists in Italy issues the Benevento Resolution,  warning against exposure to electromagnetic radiation and calling for wireless-free zones and wise siting of antennas.

2006.  The Chamber of Doctors in Vienna,  Austria,  issues posters for clinics and doctors’ offices warning patients against cell-phone use.

June 2007.  In Spain citizens hold International Day Against Electromagnetic Pollution to publicize the medical effects of high-voltage power lines,  electric-power substations,  mobile-telephone antennas,  radio lines,  WiFi,  and WiMAX.

September 2007.  Germany’s Environmental Ministry and Federal Office for Radiation Protection issues an unprecedented national warning to citizens:  avoid exposure to radiation emanating from WiFi and WiMAX ports in cafés,  schools,  and public “hot spots.”

September 2007.  The European Environmental Agency demands immediate action to reduce exposure to radiation from WiFi,  WiMAX,  mobile phones,  and antennas.

October 2007.  Protestors in a Druze village in Israel rip down a mobile phone mast.  Police open fire on them;  they fight back throwing stones and metal bars.

December 2007.  After only five months of the new WiFi system in Paris’ libraries,  the union wins a moratorium due to the health effects  among librarians.

January 2008.  Thousands of Chinese demonstrators take to the streets to protest the extension of a magnetic levitation train through Shanghai.

February 2008.  Cell-phone antennas in Tudela,  Spain,  are removed when damage to citizens’ health is revealed.

March 2008.  The Sebastopol City Council in California breaks its contract to install citywide WiFi.

April 2008.  The National Library of France dismantles its entire WiFi system.

September 2008.  The Linn-Wilsonville School Board in Portland,  Oregon,  unplugs its cell towers and cancels leases for WiMAX.

http://www.counterpunch.com/glendinning10122008.html

Advertisements




Cellphone radiation levels vary widely, watchdog report says

9 09 2009
Cellphone radiation levels vary widely, watchdog report says
By Leslie Cauley, USA TODAY
Some cellphones emit several times more radiation than others, the Environmental Working Group found in one of the most exhaustive studies of its kind.

The government watchdog group on Wednesday releases a list ranking cellphones in terms of radiation. The free listing of more than 1,000 devices can be viewed at www.ewg.org.

Concerns about radiation and cellphones have swirled for years. Scientific evidence to date has not been able to make a hard link between cancer and cellphones. But recent studies “are showing increased risk for brain and mouth tumors for people who have used cellphones for at least 10 years,” says Jane Houlihan, senior vice president of research at the Washington-based group.

CTIA, the wireless industry lobbying association, disagrees. In a statement it noted that “scientific evidence has overwhelmingly indicated that wireless devices do not pose” a health hazard.

That’s why the American Cancer Society, World Health Organization and Food and Drug Administration, among others, “all have concurred that wireless devices are not a public health risk,” the CTIA statement says.

Houlihan acknowledges that “the verdict is still out” on whether cellphones can be linked directly to cancer.

“But there’s enough concern that the governments of six countries” — including France, Germany and Israel — “have issued limits of usage of cellphones, particularly for children.”

Houlihan says her group is “advising people to choose a phone that falls on the lower end of the (radiation) spectrum” to minimize potential health problems. The Samsung Impression has the lowest: 0.35 watts per kilogram, a measure of how much radiation is absorbed into the brain when the phone is held to the ear.

The highest: T-Mobile‘s MyTouch 3G, Motorola Moto VU204 and Kyocera Jax S1300, all at 1.55 W/kg.

The Apple iPhone, sold exclusively by AT&T in the USA, is in the middle of the pack at 1.19 W/kg.

The Federal Communications Commission, which sets standards for cellphone radiation, requires that all devices be rated at 1.6 W/kg or lower.

The Environmental Working Group says the FCC‘s standard is outmoded, noting that it was established 17 years ago, when cellphones and wireless usage patterns were much different. The group wants the government to take a “fresh look” at radiation standards.

The FCC currently doesn’t require handset makers to divulge radiation levels. As a result, radiation rankings for dozens of devices, including the BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8230 and Motorola KRZR, aren’t on the group’s list.

SOURCE: USA Today

Cellphone radiation levels vary widely, watchdog report says





Scientists warn US Congress of cancer risk for cell phone use

26 09 2008

The potential link between mobile telephones and brain cancer could be similar to the link between lung cancer and smoking — something tobacco companies took 50 years to recognize, according to US scientists’ warning.

Scientists are currently split on the level of danger the biological effects of the magnetic field emitted by cellular telephones poses to humans.

However, society “must not repeat the situation we had with the relationship between smoking and lung cancer where we … waited until every ‘i’ was dotted and ‘t’ was crossed before warnings were issued,” said David Carpenter, director of the Institute of Health and Environment at the University of Albany, in testimony before a subcommittee of the US House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Reform.

“Precaution is warranted even in the absence of absolutely final evidence concerning the magnitude of the risk” — especially for children, said Carpenter.

Ronald Herberman, director of the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute — one of the top US cancer research centers — said that most studies “claiming that there is no link between cell phones and brain tumors are outdated, had methodological concerns and did not include sufficient numbers of long-term cell phone users.

Many studies denying a link defined regular cell phone use as “once a week,” he said.

Read Entire Article Here:

Scientists warn US Congress of cancer risk for cell phone use





Austin Event Tonight: Energetic Effects on Consciousness

23 09 2008

Energetic Effects on Consciousness: Invisible Pollution or Panacea?
Presented by James B. Beal, B.S. (M.E.)
Tuesday, September 23rd, 6:30 – 8:30 P.M.
Austin History Center, 810 Guadalupe, Austin, TX 78701

Potential causes, symptoms, therapies, cures, precautions, and recent research associated with hazardous EMF’s will be discussed.  The wide-ranging healing stimulation effects of EMF’s have been utilized in many other countries since 1849; why, then, have EMF studies been suppressed in the US since the 1920s?  Research documents and references on this topic will be available.

Need we be concerned about the biological effects of electromagnetic fields (EMF’s) from the proximity to power lines?  Should we be concerned about the new wireless technologies in and around near our homes, such as cell phones, wireless networks, cell towers, antennas, and portable home phones? Wireless networks in home, schools, offices, libraries and public places around the globe are starting to be dismantled due to cognitive, neurological and other symptoms adults and children are experiencing as a result of long tern use. See The BioInitiative Report  (www.bioinitiative.org).

A Point To Ponder:  All the good comes with some bad.  Think about it! We pay a price for everything in life.  And you pay a higher price if you don’t know what price you are paying.  In the power and communication areas, the corporations who are bringing you all the wireless and power novelties, claim to occupy the “high ground of new tech.”  They claim they are bringing us better “service.”

“They” are interested in supplying more power and more improved communication systems as rapidly as possible, for the benefit of mankind (and their pocketbooks).  If anybody says “Let’s go slow here, and look at long-term effects”, it looks like the imposition of a narrow judgment view on a society impatient to enjoy, immediately, the miracles of modern electronic technology.  The “quick, unthinking, habituated response” is “Shoot the messenger!”  Massive denial of any hazardous biological effects of EMF’s, even though known, as with controlled frequencies and intensities of many types, have been successfully used i n healing therapies in other countries since 1849!  Pioneering electromagnetic researcher, Dr. Robert Becker, suggests there is both a “peril and a promise” to emerging electromagnetic technology.  Where does the truth lie?

What happens when biologically effective frequencies and intensities are “accidentally” in our environment long-term?   What do we know? What does the research prove, from other countries?  Are we aware or unaware of a pollution that is invisible?  Are these invisible energies affecting us? Are environmentally sensitive people being the “human canaries for the rest of us? Think about it!

About James Beal

James B. Beal, B.S. (M.E.), EMF Interface Consultant and retired NASA engineer, will present a 45-year overview of research findings about the healing aspects and the hazards of electromagnetic fields (EMF’s) and effects on health and consciousness. This will be about the EMF long-term biological effects on (as well as emitted by) living creatures (including humans ), when exposed to the strong artificial fields produced by our power and wireless technologies.

After 35 years work at Boeing, NASA, and Martin Marietta: External Tank Facility, New Orleans, Beal studied the effects of natural and artificial electromagnetic fields (EMF’s) on living systems. Beal shares a patent on electrostatic cooling, a form of weld for the Space Shuttle External Tank, with Michael Badinger, still of Louisiana.  Beal serves on Advisory Boards of The Monroe Institute, which studies hemi-sync energetic tapes and The Gladys T. McGarey  Wholistic Medical Foundation, and the INACS Board of Austin, Texas.  He assisted astronaut Edgar Mitchell in the formation of The Institute of Noetic Sciences (1972-73).  Chapters on consciousness and field effects appear in seven books.  Mr. Beal has obtained numerous grants for travel and lectures internationally. He now does private consulting for individuals at home, business and property assessments for health-stressful EMF Effects.

Contact info:
James B. Beal, EMF Interface Consulting
P.O. Box 2112
Wimberley, TX 78676
512-847-0371
www.emfinterface.com
EMFEFFECTS@aol.com

(Submitted by IONS-Austin Program Coordinator, Roberta Shoemaker-Beal)

Energetic Effects on Consciousness 09/23/08 « IONSAustin





Mobile phone use raises childrens risk of brain cancer fivefold – Science, News – The Independent

22 09 2008

Alarming new research from Sweden on the effects of radiation raises fears that today’s youngsters face an epidemic of the disease in later life

By Geoffrey Lean, Environment Editor
Sunday, 21 September 2008

Children and teenagers are five times more likely to get brain cancer if they use mobile phones, startling new research indicates.

The study, experts say, raises fears that today’s young people may suffer an “epidemic” of the disease in later life. At least nine out of 10 British 16-year-olds have their own handset, as do more than 40 per cent of primary schoolchildren.

Yet investigating dangers to the young has been omitted from a massive £3.1m British investigation of the risks of cancer from using mobile phones, launched this year, even though the official Mobile Telecommunications and Health Research (MTHR) Programme – which is conducting it – admits that the issue is of the “highest priority”.

Read entire article here:

Mobile phone use raises childrens risk of brain cancer fivefold – Science, News – The Independent





2 Billion may suffer from Mobile Cancer by 2020: Study – Newindpress.com

23 06 2008

Cell phone cancer

ANI/Business Wire India
June 22, 2008

NEW DELHI: The studies and survey conducted by Australian Health Research Institute indicates that due to billions of times more in volume electromagnetic radiation emitted by billions of mobile phones, internet, intranet and wireless communication data transmission will make almost one-third of world population (about two billions) patient of ear, eye and brain cancer beside other major body disorders like heart ailments, impotency, migraine, epilepsy.

According to the reports the tissues of children are tender and are likely to be more effected by use of any wireless gadget and devices and they should not be encouraged to use mobile phone.

The fatal and volumetric effects of electromagnetic radiation emitted mainly by mobile phones, mobile phone antenna, tower, mast, transmission tower, microwave oven, wireless devices, system and equipment.

These dangerous effects have been certified and confirmed repeatedly by many leading medical and scientific research institutions of the world including Ministries of health of various governments, W.H.O. and now have been admitted and confirmed by Govt. of India in their recent press releases.

The attached image shows and proves about the serious ill effects of E.M. radiation released by Radiation Nuclear and Safety Authority of FINLAND as to how E.M. radiation emitted by mobile phones damages the various body cells and causes incurable and fatal diseases.

2 Billion may suffer from Mobile Cancer by 2020: Study – Newindpress.com





Mobile phones 'more dangerous than smoking' – The Independent

31 03 2008

 Young people are at particular risk from exposure to radiation

By Geoffrey Lean
Sunday, 30 March 2008

Mobile phones could kill far more people than smoking or asbestos, a study by an award-winning cancer expert has concluded. He says people should avoid using them wherever possible and that governments and the mobile phone industry must take “immediate steps” to reduce exposure to their radiation.

Mobile phones ‘more dangerous than smoking’ – Health News, Health & Wellbeing – The Independent